Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Ethics is sometimes an easy thing to overlook in sports. We want to perform well and win, oftentimes it doesn’t matter how we do it. However, setting a good example for my athletes is something that I feel strongly about. Fostering a culture of good sportsmanship and acceptance of others is a big task, but something I will strive for on any team that I coach. Ethical leadership can sometimes be overlooked, but when a situation arises that demands good sportsmanship and setting a good example for the athletes, it becomes an issue that is front and center.

It became a huge issue on our field about two weeks ago. We were playing a conference doubleheader at home and there was a controversial call at home plate. The call went for us, and the coach of the opposing team exploded. She was screaming and cursing and had to restrained by the umpires. The parents and her team then followed her lead and were likewise out of control and screaming and yelling on the field. The opposing coach ended up getting thrown out of the game and campus safety had to be called in to keep the peace. We ended up winning both games of the doubleheader, all the while putting up with poor sportsmanship from the other team. Our girls were told not to react or engage and to just play the game and show up the other team on the scoreboard. That is what we did. The other team, whose coach could not control herself and who displayed poor ethical leadership for her team, ended up losing both games and faced possible disciplinary action by the ECAC. This was a prime example of how important ethical leadership is and how coaches actions can  negatively (or positively!) affect a team’s attitude and performance.

Commitment to the Players
1. Coaches shall put the welfare of their student-athletes above all else while maintaining professional relationships with them.
2. All games shall be conducted within the letter and intent of the rules of fastpitch softball.
3. Coaches shall encourage the student-athlete to exhibit sportsmanship at all times.
4. Coaches shall always remember that their players are student-athletes and not make demands upon them that are inconsistent with institutional, conference and national governing body rules or in any way compromise the student-athletes’ academic pursuits.
5. Coaches shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sexual orientation, age, national or ethnic origin, or qualified handicapped or disabled persons.
6. Coaches shall follow institutional, conference, national governing body, high school and state association rules regarding drug, alcohol and tobacco use.

Commitment to the Institution
1. Coaches shall behave in such a way that they shall bring credit to their profession and themselves.
2. Coaches shall exhibit professionalism in their actions, words and attire.
3. Coaches shall act in full accordance with institutional, conference and national governing body rules.
4. Coaches shall immediately report any violation of conference or governing body rules regardless of how minor they believe the violation to be.
5. Dissatisfaction with the implementation of institutional, conference and national governing body rules shall be addressed through the proper channels and not through the media or through public opinion.

Commitment to Other Coaches
1. A coach has an obligation to be honest and forthright during the recruiting process. A coach must refrain from making derogatory statements about another coach or institution.
2. Coaches shall treat their colleagues with dignity and respect.
3. Any recruiting of a player at another institution of higher education shall be done in strict accordance with the governing body rules of both institutions involved (e.g., NAIA, NJCAA, NCAA, Cal Community College).
4. Coaches shall honor all professional relationships with their colleagues. They shall avoid conflicts of interest and exploitation of these relationships.

Commitment to Umpires
1. All game umpires shall be treated in a professional and respectable manner at all times.
2. Any displeasure with an umpire’s actions or conduct shall be addressed through the proper channels and not through the media or through public opinion.
3. The NFCA members shall strive to develop positive working relations with the umpires.

My current levels of stress as a coach at WNEC are fairly low. I love working with the team, I have a good relationship with the head coach, and I love game strategy and making tough decisions during the games. I also enjoy planning and running practices and have worked hard to earn the respect of the athletes as well as my fellow coaches. I am currently at a level where I feel confident in my skills and abilities to lead a practice, teach specific skills, and make important decisions. The areas where I do feel stress are the long travel time to WNEC as well as long trips on the bus, my relationship with the other assistant coach, and juggling my coaching duties with my school commitments and my personal time.

In order to more effectively handle some of those stressors, there are several options that I can use to decrease stress. For example, the 45 minute one way drive to WNEC is not only time consuming but also puts stress on me because of the cost and gas and the mileage I put on my car. In order to feel less stress in the car, I try to make phone calls to my family so that I can catch up with them and I reward myself with new CD’s or guilty pleasure CD’s to make the time go by faster.

Another stress are the long road trips and trying to fit in all of my homework and school commitments when we are on the road for so long. To handle this stress, I can try to use one of the pointers from the Seven Habits of Highly Effective People and Put First Things First. I can prioritize the work that I need to get done, take some of it on the bus with me, and leave the rest for an 0ff day or practice day.

Lastly, my relationship with the other assistant coach is fairly strained and this can lead to stress when we have to work closely together. To handle this stress, I have tried avoiding her, just being polite, and speaking to the head coach about our relationship. None of those have seemed to work, but I need to try and work on this relationship by dealing with her directly and using my head coach as a source of social support. Having her support gives me the encouragement and strength I need to get along with the assistant coach. Social support and communication are two of the major reasons why female coaches so often are overly stressed in their profession and why they are leaving the profession. This social support and developing a network of support around me is vital to handling stress, as evidenced by my current situation.

The Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) is a questionnaire that describes various leadership behaviors. After completing the LPI for myself, as well as giving it to 5 others to complete about me, I have a good idea of what leadership behaviors and practices that I need to work on. Here are my results:

Self Results

1. Modeller

2. Encourager

3. Challenger

4. Inspirer

5. Enabler

As you can see, my two weakest categories are enabling others to act and inspiring a vision. After averaging the scores of the observers who completed the questionnaire, the results were as follows:

Observer Results

1. Modeller

2. Encourager

3. Challenger

4. Enabler

5. Inspirer

My results matched up with the observers’ results with my two areas to improve being enabling and inspiring. In order to improve these areas, I am going to work on specific behaviors pertaining to enabling and inspiring. I am going to inspire a common vision by:

1. Setting team and individual goals that are both short-term AND long-term. Those goals will encompass my vision for our future as a team and for the future of each individual.

2. Being more vocal in terms of what we are working towards on and off the field

I am going to enable others to act by:

1. Letting them figure out the answers for themselves. For example, if they ask me what they are doing wrong up at bat, I will turn the question back to them and ask them what they think are doing wrong.

2. Being vocal in letting the players know that I am confident in their abilities and in the choices they make.

By following through with this plan, I hope to improve on those areas where I can grow in terms of being a leader.

In addition, my LSS scores (as seen in my 3/21 blog post), indicate that I rate low on the scales of autocratic behavior and social support. As I work on enabling others to act, my behavior will be less autocratic because I will put more emphasis on players making decisions for themselves instead of having all those decisions come from the coaching staff. In terms of improving social support as a coach, I am going to make a point of talking to each athlete about her day and what is going on in her life OFF the softball field.

One last area of leadership that I can improve upon takes into account Blake Mouton’s managerial grid. The two factors, concern for performance and concern for people are rated in terms of low to high. I fall moderate to high on concern for performance (7.3) and moderate on concern for people (6.1). I want to score higher on my concern for people by improving my social support as discussed above. With a higher score regarding concern for my athletes, I will fall solidly in the quadrant that Mouton terms “Team Leader.”

With specific behaviors to work on, I am excited to improve my leadership skills for the end of this season so that they carry over as I leave Smith and (hopefully) have my own team to coach!

Qualities that my athletes expect from me, as their assistant coach, include: confidence, competence, humor, and commitment. My athletes look to me for answers; they want to know what they do in certain defensive situation or what they need to fix in their swing. They expect that I will be able to give them the answer along with drills that they can do in order to work on their weaknesses. In addition, the athletes need to be able to relax and unwind at certain times and being able to laugh with them establishes a better relationship and makes them feel more connected to me as a person. Lastly, they want to know that I care about them and the team. They want to know that I am going to be there and that I am going to invest in them as players and as individuals.

In terms of what I expect from my head coach, the biggest thing is open-mindedness. I want to know that she is going to be open to hearing new ideas for practice or game strategy. She doesn’t need to like everything that I have to say, but I want her to hear me out. The other big thing is communication. I want to know what is going on with the team, what she needs and expects from me, and what I can do to help out.

The LSS is a scale designed to measure leadership related to 5 different dimensions of coaching: training and instruction, democratic behavior, autocratic behavior, social support, and positive feedback. Respondents read specific statements related to the different dimension and circle an answer between 1 (never) and 5 (always).

After taking the LSS in order to rate myself as a coach, I had the following scores:

1. Training and Instruction: 3.1

2. Democratic Behavior; 2.3

3. Autocratic Behavior: 1.8

4. Social Support: 1.4

5. Positive feedback: 3.4

I then administered the LSS to seven different members of my team and changed the wording so that the answered the statements in accordance with what they would PREFER a coach do. I averaged those and came up with the following scores:

1. Training and Instruction: 4.3

2. Democratic Behavior: 2.9

3. Autocratic Behavior: 1.9

4. Social Support: 3.0

5. Positive feedback: 4.1

Based on these scores, I should change my behavior so it is more aligned with what the team prefers in a coach. In order to match up with their preferences, I need to increase training and instrctuion, social support, and positive feedback. I can do this by explaining specific roles in practice, giving more praise after things are done right, and taking more of an interest in the personal lives and dynamics of the team.

National coaching certification that offers 3 levels of certification:

http://www.ussa.edu/continuing-education/certification-programs/national-coaching/

Situational Leadership: An analysis of Remember the Titans

Sara Schoenhoft

ESS 520- Leadership in Sport

2/22/11

Situational leadership is the idea that one changes his or her leadership style in a given situation. According to Hershey and Blanchard, the type of leadership that is appropriate for any given situation is driven by follower readiness or development.  Readiness is based on two factors: ability, meaning the follower has the necessary knowledge, skill, and experience and willingness, or confidence, commitment, and motivation.

The theoretical model put forth by Hershey and Blanchard matches up each follower readiness level with an appropriate leadership style. R1 means that the followers are low on ability and low on confidence. This calls for leadership style S1, which is comparable to a dictator, and involves the coach providing specific instructions and closely supervising performance. S1 falls on the spectrum that is high on task behavior but low on relationship behavior. R2 is the next follower level where the followers are still low in ability but high in willingness. S2 is the leadership style to go along with R2 and is high on task and high on relationships. The leader, in this case, explains decisions and provides opportunity for clarification. R3 (high on ability, low on willingness) matches up with S3 (low task, high relationship) which is a supportive leadership style. The leader shares ideas and facilitates in decision making. The final level is R4 (high ability, high willingness) and the final leadership style is S4, a kind of laissez-faire style of coaching. In S4, the leader turns over responsibility for decisions and implementation.

Remember the Titans is a movie based on the true story of integration in the 1970’s and how that plays out on the high school football field. It is also a good illustration of situational leadership and follower readiness as the movie follows the black head coach, Coach Boone, and the white assistant coach, Coach Yoast, along with their new racially integrated football team.

The movie starts out with the teams from the separate schools hanging out with just each other, showing that they are comfortable with members of their race and comfortable with their roles and positions on their respective teams. However, when the two must merge together the level of discomfort and unease is evident from the very first team meeting. This is an example of a team in the forming stage of Bruce Tuckman’s model of group development. Forming is the stage characterized by uncertainty and shyness. The team doesn’t know what to expect from each other or their coaches. In this scene of the first team meeting, Coach Boone addresses the black players and tells them that this is a dictatorship, not a democracy. He clearly establishes himself and sets the tone for what he expects from his team members (Remember the Titans, 11:15). Coach Yoast then walks in with the white athletes and the whole team meets for the very first time (Remember the Titans, 13:25). Although this is still technically forming, there is always an underlying sense of conflict and tension, which is perhaps a result of overall unease of the community and the nation in regards to race relations at this point in history.

The next scene depicts Coach Boone shoving his team into the storming stage as they prepare to leave for pre-season training camp. He assigns white and black players to sit together and lets them know that they will also be rooming together at camp (Remember the Titans, 17:00).This is a great example of a coach knowingly pushing his team into conflict so that they can get though storming and into norming and performing.

At the forming stage, the follower readiness level is R1. They segregate themselves whenever possible, showing an unwillingness to come together and play as a team. This is evident in the first team meeting and when they get on the buses to go to training camp. In addition, the newness of the team along with the racial hostility in the community at large makes it so that they are unable to come together.

Coach Boone’s leadership style is S1 at this point. He explicitly states that this is a dictatorship, not a democracy, and his authority is further established when he is approached by two of the white players, Gary and Ray, who try to tell him how to run the team (Remember the Titans, 15:30). He publicly states that he is in charge and clearly puts them in their place in front of the team, coaching staff, and all of their families.

On the other hand, Coach Yoast seems to be in leadership style S2. His approach draws on the relationships he has with his players and the community and he tries to explain what is going on without being a complete authoritarian. I think that the difference in their coaching styles at this point of the team development stems from the fact that Yoast has a relationship with many of the boys and their families while Boone is trying to come in and prove himself in an openly hostile environment. If Boone weren’t as tough as he was, it would be hard for him to ever earn the respect that he needed to run the team.

As the team leaves for training camp, it is clear that they are in the storming phase. There are multiple instances of hostility and tension between the black and white players. Arguments over who gets which bed and what posters to hang on walls eventually gives way to a fist fight between Gary (the white captain) and Julius (the black team leader) who were assigned to room together (Remember the Titans, 19:10).

As practice gets underway, there is constant conflict between teammates and coaches alike. Yoast makes it obvious that he doesn’t always agree with what Boone is doing by his facial expressions and his tone of voice. At one point, Yoast talks to Boone about introducing new plays and letting the boys have some fun and Boone is not open or willing to hear any new ideas (Remember the Titans, 23:20). Boone is pushing his players to the brink, in their faces yelling at them and punishing them if they miss a tackle or fumble a football (Remember the Titans, 20:45-22:00).

During this stage of intense storming, the team begins to enter R2 of follower readiness. They are still unable to work together and play at the highest level, but they are starting to feel more secure in their roles on the team and are showing a level of willingness to get to know their teammates, black and white alike. Boone tells everyone that they must get to know every one of their teammates and report back to him on what they are learning (Remember the Titans, 26:00). Some of the players start to bond and form new relationships, which lays the groundwork for the team to progress into the norming stage.

At this point, Coach Boone is still in leadership style S1. He tells his players and coaches what to do with no room for suggestions or input. He makes sure that it is clear that he is the final authority on and off the field. Coach Yoast is somewhere between S2 and S3. His concern for the relationships with his players is evident when he questions Boone for pushing them too hard (Remember the Titans, 27:50) or when he wants to introduce some new plays to let the boys have some fun. He is supportive and encouraging of his players at practice and motivates them without being too harsh. I think that this difference in coaching is good in that is provides a good balance between two extremes. However, it is harmful to the team in that the coaches are clearly not on the same page so that makes it hard for the players to work together when it is obvious that the coaching staff is struggling to work together.

The team slowly creeps into the norming stage and it is evident during the Gettysburg run scene (Remember the Titans, 31:00). Boone wakes them up at 3:00 AM and takes them on a grueling run to the battlefield of Gettysburg. During the run, you see teammates supporting each other and pushing each other to keep moving, and by the time they finish the run, they are too exhausted to hate each other or fight.

More evidence of norming is clear when Gary calls out a white teammate for not blocking for a black quarterback (Remember the Titans, 34:45). Julius and Gary, the two leaders who were constantly at odds with each other, come together at the end of a grueling practice to show team spirit and camaraderie. At this point, roles are clear and the team is sorting out what it stands for. The players start to come together and there is a comfort level that never existed. The team is seen cheering, encouraging, and pumping each other up (Remember the Titans, 36:00), they joke around and sing with each other in the locker room (Remember the Titans, 38:05), and they sit at mixed tables in the dining hall. When they leave camp after two weeks, they are feeling good and have clearly come a long way since they left.

Once they get back to school, there is obvious tension within the community, but the team fights to stay united and play together. Julius and Gary work together to break up fights at school and the team goes out to celebrate after wins together. But the racial discomfort is always close at hand when the team members get kicked out of a restaurant because some of them are black. They win the first couple of games, but Boone points out that they aren’t playing with any heart. The turning point into the performing phase is when the team calls a meeting without the coaches and comes up with their own warm-up routine to distinguish themselves from everyone else and to make sure they are playing with heart and soul (Remember the Titans, 1:04:00).

During the norming phase, the team progresses into R3. They are definitely able to get along and play together, but once they leave camp their confidence is shaken by the racial tension they encounter. Coach Boone also progresses in his leadership style to S2. The relationships with his players and coaches start to develop (Remember the Titans, 58:30) and he becomes more of a coach than a dictator. Coach Yoast is at S3 at this point. His relationship behavior is high, as evidenced when he convinces Petey to play defense for him after Boone had chewed him out (Remember the Titans, 51:00). Coach Boone and Yoast seem to be more on the same page at this point in the movie and it reflects in their team.

The team is in the performing stage as they continue to win games and eventually go 13-0 to win the state championship. Their unique warm-up style gives their team an identity and sets them apart from the competition (Remember the Titans, 1:07:05). Players step up and get the job done when they are called on (Remember the Titans, 1:09:30), and the bad seeds are weeded out by the players, like when Gary decides he needs to kick Ray off the team for not doing his job (Remember the Titans, 1:12:25). During this performing stage, the team is definitely at R4. They have the ability and the confidence to win football games and play as a team. They are bought into the coaching staff and each other and it shows on the field.

In terms of the leadership style, Coach Boone stays in S2 for the most part, but he also shows glimpses of S3 and S4. He shows great concern for a player when he hugs him after hearing about his eligibility for college and he lets Gary make the decision to kick Ray off the team. Boone also starts to be more open to ideas from Yoast, like in the championship game when Yoast tells Boone he needs to change it up and do something different (Remember the Titans, 1:42:45). This openness to new ideas shows Boone’s leadership style adaptability. As the situations called for it, Boone used a different leadership style. Yoast was also in S2 at this point in the movie; he listened to Boone for ideas about defense and continued to push and motivate his players. He let the one of the team members make the decision when a player gave up his spot to another player when he wasn’t getting the job done (Remember the Titans, 1:39:50), showing an S4 style of leadership. Yoast also continued to show high concern for relationships as he did throughout the movie by visiting Gary in the hospital and trying to comfort him after his life changing injury.

Overall, this movie was a good illustration of situational leadership. Coach Boone, who seemed like he would never be anything but an authoritarian, adapted his leadership styles as his team proved that they needed a different kind of leader. In addition, while the conflicts throughout the movie were inevitable, as the team progressed though the group development stages and through the readiness levels, the coaches progressed as well, proving that progress can lead to near perfection.

References

Allerman, G.B. (2004). Forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Retrieved from http://coachleadership.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/formstormnormperform.pdf 7 February, 2011.

Bruckheimer, J. & Yakin, B. (2000). Remember the Titans. United States: Disney.

ChangingMinds.org. “Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership.” Retrieved from http://changingminds.org/disciplines/leadership/styles/situational_leadership_hersey_blanchard.htm 22 February, 2011.

After the first 2.5 weeks of practice at WNEC, I am starting to get to know the softball team and the individual players. There is one player in particular, a first year, who is struggling immensely with her performance and her attitude. She is a self-proclaimed shortstop, but her lack of arm strength makes it improbable that she will see any playing time at shortstop. The coaching staff and I have decided to move her over to second base because it is a shorter throw and she might have a chance to play if she focuses on second base rather than shortstop.

Her lack of skill is exacerbated by her poor attitude and work ethic. She does not respond well to constructive criticism or feedback. She doesn’t put forth any effort to change her mechanics when instructed, she fails to make eye contact when being spoken to by the coaches, and her overall effort level is very low. According to the follower developmental scale, she would be classified as D1, unable, that is, lacks the necessary knowledge, experience, and skill, and unwilling, or lacks the necessary confidence, commitment, and motivation. At a D1 follower level, Hershey and Blanchard theorize that the best leadership style to use would be S1. S1 is the leader behavior of telling, where the leader provides specific instructions and closely supervises performance. It can be compared to a dictator type of leadership and falls high when it comes to task or performance and low when it comes to relationship.

This weekend, I decided to try out the S1 leadership style with this player. We were having an intersquad scrimmage and she was playing second base. She made a few errors in a row and I pulled her aside and told her what she needed to do in order to improve her performance. She barely acknowledged me when I gave her feedback and just turned and ran back to her position with a slight shake of her head. A few plays later, she made another error. I immediately pulled her in and told her what she should have done in that situation. She proceeded to roll her eyes at me! I was so angry and I immediately went to the head coach to report the player’s rude and disrespectful behavior. We agree that something needs to be done about her attitude because we really don’t want that kind of negative energy on the team.

Clearly, the S1 leadership style didn’t really work because her performance did not improve and her attitude worsened throughout practice. I want to try out a different leadership style to see if I can get through to her and hopefully improve her attitude and performance. I am going to go for S2 at the next practice, high on task and moderate to high on relationship, to see if she responds better when things are being explained to her instead of her just being told what to do. My fingers are crossed…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership